COMPARISON
N8N vs Lazarus: Why Workflow Automation Falls Short for AI Agents
N8N is great for workflows. But AI agents need something different: human oversight built in.
If you're building AI agents, you've probably looked at N8N. It's a powerful workflow automation tool—open source, flexible, with hundreds of integrations.
But here's the problem: N8N was built for workflows. AI agents are different.
When AI makes mistakes, it makes them at scale. And without human oversight, those mistakes compound.
The human oversight problem
AI agents are incredibly capable. They can analyze data, write content, manage tasks, and interact with dozens of tools. But they're not perfect—and when they get something wrong, the consequences can be expensive.
Common AI agent mistakes:
- Sending emails to the wrong recipients
- Updating CRM data with incorrect information
- Creating reports based on misinterpreted data
- Taking actions based on ambiguous instructions
- Escalating routine issues or ignoring important ones
With traditional workflow tools like N8N, you have two choices: let the automation run unsupervised, or manually review every action. Neither scales.
What you actually need is selective human oversight—approval for high-stakes decisions, autonomy for routine tasks.
Feature comparison: N8N vs Lazarus
| Feature | N8N | Lazarus |
|---|---|---|
| Human-in-the-Loop | Manual workarounds | Built-in approval workflows |
| Human Contact Methods | None native | Email, Slack, Discord, in-app |
| Guardrails | No native concept | Set rules for when agents escalate |
| Design Philosophy | Workflow-first, bolted-on AI | Agent-first from day one |
| Agent Builder | Complex node setup | Describe in plain English |
| Team Collaboration | Limited | Shared workspace for agents + humans |
| Persistent Memory | Stateless workflows | Agents remember and build on work |
How human-in-the-loop works in Lazarus
In Lazarus, human oversight isn't an afterthought—it's built into how agents work.
1. Set the guardrails
Define when your agent should ask for approval. "Always check with me before sending emails to clients." "Run reports automatically, but flag anything unusual." You set the rules in plain English.
2. Agent reaches out when needed
When an agent hits a decision point you care about, it contacts you—via email, Slack, Discord, or Lazarus Chat. You get the context you need to make a decision quickly.
3. Approve, reject, or modify
Review the agent's proposed action and approve it, reject it, or give it new instructions. The agent learns from your feedback and continues working.
4. Autonomous for the rest
Everything else runs automatically. Your agent handles routine tasks at machine speed while you focus on the decisions that actually need human judgment.
When to use N8N vs Lazarus
Use N8N when:
- • You need traditional workflow automation
- • Tasks are predictable and rule-based
- • Human oversight isn't critical
- • You want to self-host everything
Use Lazarus when:
- • You're building autonomous AI agents
- • Agents need to make judgment calls
- • Human approval is needed for some decisions
- • You want agents that remember and improve
The bottom line: N8N automates workflows. Lazarus builds AI teammates you can trust.
Ready to build agents with oversight?
Your next 10 hires will be AI. Make sure they know when to ask for help.
Related articles
How to Build AI Agents Without Code: A Complete Guide
Step-by-step guide to building your first agent in 15 minutes
Why 95% of Enterprise AI Pilots Fail (And How to Fix It)
The 3 infrastructure gaps killing most AI deployments
AI Agents for Sales Teams: 5 Ways to Automate
How sales teams use AI agents without losing the human touch
Questions?
founders@thinklazarus.com • (775) 368-5234 • github.com/thinklazarus